Revisions and Resubmissions

Submit Journal Article          Submit Book Proposal          Submit Book Manuscript

 

Handling revised manuscripts is a critical step in the editorial workflow. This process ensures that authors' revisions address reviewers' feedback and meet the press's standards for quality and compliance. Below, we provide guidance on managing revisions and resubmissions effectively.

  1. Communicating Revision Requirements
  • Clear Instructions: Provide authors with detailed feedback based on reviewer comments and editorial evaluation. Specify the necessary changes and the expectations for the revised manuscript.
  • Revision Timeline: Clearly state the deadline for submitting the revised manuscript. Allow reasonable time for thorough revisions, typically between 2 to 4 weeks, depending on the complexity of the changes.
  1. Reviewing the Resubmitted Manuscript
  • Completeness Check: Ensure that the revised manuscript includes all requested changes. Use the authors' response letter to verify that each feedback point has been addressed.
  • Quality Assessment: Confirm that the manuscript adheres to formatting, citation, and structural guidelines outlined in the submission requirements.
  • Reviewer Re-Evaluation: For significant revisions, consider sending the manuscript back to the original reviewers for further evaluation. Alternatively, conduct an internal review for minor changes.
  1. Handling Author Responses
  • Response Letter: Require authors to submit a detailed response letter outlining how they addressed each reviewer comment.
  • Clarifications: If any revisions are incomplete or unclear, communicate with the authors promptly to clarify expectations.
  1. Decision on Revised Manuscripts
  • Accept, Reject, or Revise Again: Based on the revised manuscript and reviewers' feedback, decide whether to accept, reject, or request further revisions.
  • Timely Feedback: Ensure that authors receive decisions and feedback promptly to maintain efficiency and transparency in the process.
  1. Common Issues to Watch For
  • Superficial Revisions: Ensure that authors have made meaningful and substantive changes rather than superficial edits.
  • New Issues: Address any new issues that may have arisen in the revised manuscript, including inconsistencies or errors introduced during the revision process.
  1. Documentation and Workflow Management
  • Track Changes: Utilize the submission management system to track revisions and correspondence with authors.
  • Final Checks: Before advancing to the next stage, confirm that the manuscript meets all editorial and ethical standards.

Revisions are a collaborative effort to refine and enhance the quality of the manuscript. Clear communication and meticulous evaluation at this stage are essential for ensuring the integrity and excellence of the final publication. If you encounter any challenges during the revisions process, please reach out to the editorial office for support.